
05/11/2026
Articles and guidesHow your webshop can win in a world of tariffs and Temu fatigue

You send a payment to your supplier in Poland. The money leaves your account. And then silence for three days. No confirmation. The supplier calls asking where the money is. You call the bank. And then you wait a little longer.
This isn't an unusual experience. And the delay is only part of the total cost of making that payment.
Most businesses trading internationally pay more than they realise. Not because they're making bad decisions, but because the cost structure of traditional bank payments isn't designed to be fully transparent. Fees hide inside exchange rates. Currency margins and spreads don't appear as a line on your bank statement. And the full picture only becomes visible if you actively ask your bank for it.
Here's the paradox that rarely gets said out loud.
B2B payments from SMEs account for just 7% of total global payment flows, but generate 31% of the market's total revenue. According to FXC Intelligence — a data provider to the World Bank and the G20 payments roadmap — that makes SMEs the segment that overwhelmingly pays the most to send and receive money across borders. The average take rate for SMEs — what banks and providers earn per transaction — is 1.3%. Large corporations pay 0.2%. For the same type of transfer.
That's more than six times as much. And it's not a coincidence.
Large companies have treasury departments, dedicated banking relationships, and negotiating power. They know what they're paying, and they negotiate the terms. Smaller businesses often have just a phone number for their bank manager — and an unfair price that's hard to see through.
Mastercard and FXC Intelligence estimate that SME cross-border payments will grow by 54% through 2032. Not because infrastructure has improved — but because going global is an operational reality for a growing number of businesses. At the same time, Capgemini's World Payments Report 2026 shows that 66% of companies surveyed still prefer traditional banks as their primary payment provider. But banks are consistently falling behind on the two things that matter most: speed and price. The result is measurable: 40% of SMEs are considering switching to a fintech, neobank, or payment platform within the next year.
Thomas is fictional — but the situation is real.
Thomas runs a wholesale business in Horsens. He imports building materials from Poland, the Czech Republic, and Germany, and processes three to five international payments every week. Many of his suppliers require payment before goods are shipped.
For Thomas, a two-to-three-day delay isn't just frustrating. It's cash tied up. Stock stuck in transit. The next order that can't be placed. And a larger buffer sitting in his account than should be necessary, because he never knows exactly when the money will land on the other end.
International SWIFT payments take two to five business days, depending on correspondent banks, cut-off times, and the receiving bank — whether you're sending to Frankfurt or Warsaw. Those delays aren't just inconvenient. They carry real liquidity costs that nobody books as a line item, but everyone feels.
The visible fee is rarely the biggest expense. It's the currency margin that quietly eats into your margins.
In traditional bank payments, the currency cost is embedded in the exchange rate itself. It doesn't appear as a separate line on your statement. Data from FXC Intelligence shows that European B2B SME payments are settled at an average take rate of 0.5% — but with significant variation depending on provider and corridor. For businesses using traditional banks, the real cost is typically higher.
Thomas, with an annual foreign payment volume of DKK 20 million, typically pays 0.4–0.8% above the market rate. That works out to between DKK 80,000 and 160,000 a year — just to trade internationally. A cost that's invisible, with no dedicated line in the accounts.
Want a breakdown of where currency costs typically hide? Read our article on the 8 currency pitfalls, where we walk through them one by one.
Payments that need phone approval. Receipts sent by email. Currency accounts in one system. Business account in another. Bookkeeping in a third.
That's your finance team spending half a day every week manually piecing together an overview. It doesn't show up as a payment cost in the accounts — but that's exactly what it is.
FXC Intelligence specifically highlights intra-European payment flows as an area where SEPA infrastructure has meaningfully reduced both costs and processing times. But only for businesses with access to a platform that actually takes advantage of it. Far from all traditional banking setups do.
In a climate of volatile exchange rates and geopolitical uncertainty, the resilience of your payment setup matters. We've written about how tariffs and the global trade environment are affecting Danish businesses specifically — and what it takes to be better positioned.
Let's come back to Thomas.
In this scenario, he has access to a business account built for companies with international operations. He's kept his primary banking relationship — kompasbank doesn't ask him to switch. But his international payments and currency management have moved.
His payments to Poland and the Czech Republic go out and arrive the same day. He can see exactly what it costs to convert currencies. Margins and spreads are visible, not buried. And his bookkeeper no longer spends half a day a week manually pulling everything together.
It's not a revolution. It's the setup that should have existed from the start.
kompasbank's business account for internationally active companies may not solve every problem Thomas has. But for most Danish businesses trading abroad — paying suppliers in EUR and other major currencies, making regular currency conversions, and wanting control over their liquidity — it's built precisely for those needs.
What is your business actually paying for international payments? Not just the fee. The full number — including currency margins and spreads, the liquidity cost of delays, and the time spent on manual admin.
Most businesses don't know the answer. That in itself is worth knowing.
Explore kompasbank's business account for internationally active companies — or book a no-obligation meeting if you'd like an advisor to take a look at your current setup. 🚀
Sources: FXC Intelligence, Cross-Border Payments Global Market Sizing Report 2026 (5 March 2026); Mastercard & FXC Intelligence, Breaking barriers: banks and the SME cross-border payments revolution (2025); Capgemini, World Payments Report 2026.
For further information, please contact
Kasper Kankelborg
Head of Communication & Marketing